www.ambiente.us JULY / JULIO 2008
OPEd: GLBT Floridians Can Say No 2 Taking Away Rights,
Benefits and Protections
By Stephen Gaskill
Florida’s GLBT voters will face a divisive and unnecessary attack on their
lives at the ballot box this November: Amendment 2, the Florida Marriage
Protection Amendment. In just 37 words, this vaguely-written amendment
to the Florida Constitution could take away rights, benefits and
protections from couples in committed relationships. And that’s not just
election-year hyperbole.
Amendment 2 is also called the “gay marriage ban.” But the reality is
that same-sex marriage is already illegal in Florida under at least four
separate laws dating back a decade. So whether or not Amendment 2 is
approved by the voters, same-sex marriage will remain illegal in the
Sunshine State. But while Florida’s GLBT community is in the crosshairs in
this campaign, the state’s unmarried heterosexual couples have just as
much to lose.
That’s because the amendment language goes much further than defining marriage as only between “one
man and one woman,” as many of these types of amendments claim (California’s, for instance). The Florida
amendment reads: "Inasmuch as marriage is the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband
and wife, no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid
or recognized."
The last phrase is the problem -- “no other union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent
thereof shall be valid or recognized.” What exactly does that mean?
Does that mean civil unions? Domestic partnerships? Other legal arrangements between unmarried
couples? No one knows. The amendment’s supporters claim not to know. Even the amendment’s authors
claim not to know.
With so many unknowns, why would Florida voters approve Amendment 2?
Raising those doubts and pointing out the potential consequences of Amendment 2 is the job of Florida Red
and Blue, the bipartisan statewide organization running the Say No 2 campaign. Based in Miami, Florida
Red and Blue has raised more than $2.5 million in cash and in-kind contributions for Say No 2. (That
amount will increase when the latest quarterly figures are released in mid-July.)
Since last summer, Florida Red and Blue has been educating Floridians that they could lose shared health
care benefits, pension benefits, and even hospital visitation rights if Amendment 2 passes.
The Say No 2 campaign has gained traction, with more than 200 organizations and political leaders signing
on. Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, Florida CFO Alex Sink, the Florida AFL-
CIO, the Florida Professional Firefighters, and the League of Women Voters are just a few of the powerful
and persuasive allies Say No 2 has. (You can read the whole list at www.SayNo2.com.)
Only one state has ever defeated a “marriage protection” amendment – Arizona in 2006. That campaign is
the model for Say No 2: A heavy emphasis on research…strong bipartisan support in a broad-based
coalition…and a media campaign that focuses on the consequences on those impacted by the amendment,
especially senior couples who can’t or don’t want to marry.
While supporters of Amendment 2 claim that Red and Blue’s approach is disingenuous – they say that there’
s no precedent for taking away benefits and that Red and Blue is just scaring seniors for an electoral victory
– the reality is that Michigan recently played out Florida’s worst case scenario.
Michigan voters passed a marriage amendment with language similar to Florida’s in 2004. This spring, the
Michigan Supreme Court, in a widely-publicized interpretation of the amendment, ruled that domestic
partnerships for unmarried couples are, in the amendment’s language, a “similar union” to marriage, and
therefore sharing benefits is invalid under the voter-passed constitutional amendment. The result: people
are having their health care benefits taken away, just as opponents of the amendment claimed.
We cannot repeat that scenario here.
The Say No 2 campaign is working throughout our community to educate voters about this dangerous
amendment. California is grabbing the headlines, but Florida is the largest swing state in the country. If
Red and Blue is successful in defeating Amendment 2, it could finally be the death knell for these harmful,
hateful and wasteful constitutional amendment drives.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Gaskill is a Fort Lauderdale-based Democratic political campaign consultant.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Stephen Gaskill is a senior communications strategist and political consultant with more than 20
years of experience designing and implementing media outreach programs for political candidates,
government agencies, advocacy groups, major corporations, trade associations and ad hoc
coalitions. Based in South Florida after a long career in Washington DC, Stephen is an independent
consultant with a variety of client interests, and has served as national spokesperson on a wide
range of issues and causes. He is a veteran of Democratic politics, and held senior positions in the
last four presidential campaigns.
Copyright © AMBIENTE MAGAZINE. Do not reproduce without citing this source.
OPEd: GLBT Floridians Can Say No 2 Taking Away Rights,
Benefits and Protections
By Stephen Gaskill
Florida’s GLBT voters will face a divisive and unnecessary attack on their
lives at the ballot box this November: Amendment 2, the Florida Marriage
Protection Amendment. In just 37 words, this vaguely-written amendment
to the Florida Constitution could take away rights, benefits and
protections from couples in committed relationships. And that’s not just
election-year hyperbole.
Amendment 2 is also called the “gay marriage ban.” But the reality is
that same-sex marriage is already illegal in Florida under at least four
separate laws dating back a decade. So whether or not Amendment 2 is
approved by the voters, same-sex marriage will remain illegal in the
Sunshine State. But while Florida’s GLBT community is in the crosshairs in
this campaign, the state’s unmarried heterosexual couples have just as
much to lose.
That’s because the amendment language goes much further than defining marriage as only between “one
man and one woman,” as many of these types of amendments claim (California’s, for instance). The Florida
amendment reads: "Inasmuch as marriage is the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband
and wife, no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid
or recognized."
The last phrase is the problem -- “no other union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent
thereof shall be valid or recognized.” What exactly does that mean?
Does that mean civil unions? Domestic partnerships? Other legal arrangements between unmarried
couples? No one knows. The amendment’s supporters claim not to know. Even the amendment’s authors
claim not to know.
With so many unknowns, why would Florida voters approve Amendment 2?
Raising those doubts and pointing out the potential consequences of Amendment 2 is the job of Florida Red
and Blue, the bipartisan statewide organization running the Say No 2 campaign. Based in Miami, Florida
Red and Blue has raised more than $2.5 million in cash and in-kind contributions for Say No 2. (That
amount will increase when the latest quarterly figures are released in mid-July.)
Since last summer, Florida Red and Blue has been educating Floridians that they could lose shared health
care benefits, pension benefits, and even hospital visitation rights if Amendment 2 passes.
The Say No 2 campaign has gained traction, with more than 200 organizations and political leaders signing
on. Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, Florida CFO Alex Sink, the Florida AFL-
CIO, the Florida Professional Firefighters, and the League of Women Voters are just a few of the powerful
and persuasive allies Say No 2 has. (You can read the whole list at www.SayNo2.com.)
Only one state has ever defeated a “marriage protection” amendment – Arizona in 2006. That campaign is
the model for Say No 2: A heavy emphasis on research…strong bipartisan support in a broad-based
coalition…and a media campaign that focuses on the consequences on those impacted by the amendment,
especially senior couples who can’t or don’t want to marry.
While supporters of Amendment 2 claim that Red and Blue’s approach is disingenuous – they say that there’
s no precedent for taking away benefits and that Red and Blue is just scaring seniors for an electoral victory
– the reality is that Michigan recently played out Florida’s worst case scenario.
Michigan voters passed a marriage amendment with language similar to Florida’s in 2004. This spring, the
Michigan Supreme Court, in a widely-publicized interpretation of the amendment, ruled that domestic
partnerships for unmarried couples are, in the amendment’s language, a “similar union” to marriage, and
therefore sharing benefits is invalid under the voter-passed constitutional amendment. The result: people
are having their health care benefits taken away, just as opponents of the amendment claimed.
We cannot repeat that scenario here.
The Say No 2 campaign is working throughout our community to educate voters about this dangerous
amendment. California is grabbing the headlines, but Florida is the largest swing state in the country. If
Red and Blue is successful in defeating Amendment 2, it could finally be the death knell for these harmful,
hateful and wasteful constitutional amendment drives.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Gaskill is a Fort Lauderdale-based Democratic political campaign consultant.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Stephen Gaskill is a senior communications strategist and political consultant with more than 20
years of experience designing and implementing media outreach programs for political candidates,
government agencies, advocacy groups, major corporations, trade associations and ad hoc
coalitions. Based in South Florida after a long career in Washington DC, Stephen is an independent
consultant with a variety of client interests, and has served as national spokesperson on a wide
range of issues and causes. He is a veteran of Democratic politics, and held senior positions in the
last four presidential campaigns.
Copyright © AMBIENTE MAGAZINE. Do not reproduce without citing this source.
| RESIDENTIAL COMMERICAL Licensed Across Florida CGC060449 dructorbuilds.com 305-401-8914 |
| GAY & LESBIAN ALLIANCE AGAINST DEFAMATION WWW.GLAAD.ORG |
| Gay American Heroes Foundation Honoring LGBT persons who died because of their sexual orientation and gender identity www.gayamericanheroes.com |
| Endulge Yourself... Chocolate Themed Baskets & Gifts www.dulcestore.com |
| Web resource for LGBTQ youth www.matthewsplace.com |
| An online forum on sexual health education for gay and bisexual men www.lifelube.org |
| www.familiasporladiversidad.org |
| LIGA Contra el SIDA - SoFla. League Against AIDS www.leagueagainstaids.org |
